CFClient Funds Desk Open the partner account
Affiliate disclosure. The partner link in the masthead and beside the copy on this page is a sponsored link to a partner operator, and this site may be paid if you open an account through it, at no extra cost to you. It carries rel="sponsored noopener" and opens in a new tab. Nothing about that payment depends on what is written here: these pages contain no ranking, no review and no recommendation of any operator, and no claim that any protection, guarantee or compensation scheme applies in your territory or to your account. Explaining how customer money is held is not advice about where to keep money — a balance that is correctly held and properly protected is still a claim against a business, and gambling still carries a real risk of loss.
Client Funds Desk / Overview
Concept 17 · the custody question

Whose money is it while it sits there

A balance on a screen looks like money in a drawer. Legally it usually is not: it is a number the operator owes you, and whether that number is payable out of money kept apart from the operator's own is a separate question with a separate answer, set by the licence and by the terms.

Direct answerIn most jurisdictions a deposit stops being your property when it is credited: you hold a claim against the operator, not a share of a pot. Whether that claim is backed by money the operator is required to keep apart depends on the condition attached to its licence - and on whether that condition was actually met. A licence alone is not insurance.

A deposit is not a deposit once it lands

When money leaves your bank and appears in a gambling account, the legal relationship changes. In the ordinary case the operator receives the money into its own funds and records a liability to you: a debt. You are now a creditor of a business, with the same standing as any other unsecured creditor, unless a rule says otherwise.

That is why the question "is my money safe" has no general answer. Two operators can hold identical balances for identical customers under identical terms, and one can be holding that money in a separate account it may not touch, while the other spent it on marketing the same afternoon.

Three characterisations are possible, and which one applies decides everything that follows.

What your credited balance can be, and what each characterisation gives you
CharacterisationWhat it meansWhat you get if the operator fails
Debt The usual caseThe operator holds the money as its own and owes you an equal amount. Nothing separates your balance from the company's money.A claim in the queue, alongside everyone else the company owes. Recovery depends on what is left.
Held on trust SometimesMoney is held in a designated account on terms that make it clear it belongs to customers and cannot be used as the operator's own.The balance is taken out of the insolvency before the general creditors, if the account genuinely holds it and the trust is enforceable.
Protected Rarely, and by ruleThe regime requires the protected balance to be topped up, insured, guaranteed or ring-fenced to a stated standard.Whatever the rule promises - and nothing more. "Insured" against a named cover is a stronger promise than "segregated" with no cover.

Nothing in that table is decided by the size of the operator, the age of the brand, or how quickly withdrawals arrive on a normal day. It is decided by a clause.

Two columns that must not be the same pound

Every funds-protection rule in the world is an attempt to enforce one separation: the money customers have deposited must not become the money the business spends. Where a rule requires that separation, it describes an account, a purpose and a permission - and the interesting part of any such rule is not the word used but the mechanism it names.

The figure below sets the operator's own column against the customer column for the three ordinary custody models. It is illustrative: no operator, bank or scheme is described, and no model is recommended.

Why the word matters less than the condition

"Segregated", "protected", "safeguarded", "held on trust" and "insured" are not synonyms, and none of them is self-defining. Each takes its meaning from the authority that required it: a condition requiring an account, a condition requiring cover, and a condition requiring a documented policy are three different promises, and a marketing page that uses the strongest of the three words while the licence carries the weakest of the three conditions is not lying - it is just not telling you which one applies.

The words page sets out each label against who defines it and what it does and does not promise.

an illustrative balance of 500 against a protected pool of 4,000,000 holding 4,000,000 of claims
no shortfall: the pool pays every claim in full, and the balance is 500
a 20% shortfall: the pool holds 3,200,000 against the same 4,000,000 of claims
a claim paid at the rate of the pool: 500 x 0.80 = 400
the same balance with no protection condition: it shares whatever is left after the queue above it
so the difference between the two columns is not a percentage in a headline - it is a clause

The arithmetic is deliberately unexciting. Protection does not make a balance larger and does not pay interest; it changes the order in which a fixed pot is handed out when the pool is short. A regime that requires a top-up, an insurance policy or a guarantee is promising the 500; a regime that requires only a separate account is promising that the 500 has a better chance than the general claims.

The queue, in five rungs

When an operator fails, the balances do not get paid first, or last, or all at once. They join an order of payment that is set by the law of the company's own jurisdiction. Where a protection condition exists, it is usually expressed as a rung on that order - and the figure below shows the rung a protected balance occupies, with the same balance shown at the unprotected rung for comparison.

Scope

Nothing here ranks operators, predicts anything, or explains how to withdraw, move or recover a balance by any route other than the one the operator's own terms and the relevant authority provide. No bank, regulator, compensation scheme or operator is named as a place to hold money, and nothing on this site states that any protection condition applies in your territory. The mechanism is described in general terms because the mechanism is what a reader can check against their own operator's terms.

The partner link below is a disclosed sponsored link and the only commercial element on this page. It recommends no operator, makes no claim about any custody arrangement, and nothing here says that any protection condition, guarantee or compensation scheme applies where you are.

Open the partner account

Where to go next